Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 06:29:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 195750FA495408EC49B5D81E1C5F552DB9A3252F57EC9EE05CC447F5DF18EB2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note affichée n'est pas correcte, en plus des fautes. La note affirme que TGR n'a pas utilisé le livre alors que justement TGR explique que si. Et d'ailleurs bien ce ne soit pas un cas de plagiat stricto sensu, la question de la citation des sources existe toujours.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733890488367780283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 195750FA495408EC49B5D81E1C5F552DB9A3252F57EC9EE05CC447F5DF18EB2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1702276142890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733890488367780283195750FA495408EC49B5D81E1C5F552DB9A3252F57EC9EE05CC447F5DF18EB2C