Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 21:05:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F2F14D3EB0D13A51565E2DA182D0ADB3620B52A831E56FAD263304351C875C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN/ Kolejny przykład, w którym CN nie są potrzebne, bo przedstawiana jest subiektywna opinia. Zamiast tego, powinny być użyte komentarze do wpisu.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733849553927844244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F2F14D3EB0D13A51565E2DA182D0ADB3620B52A831E56FAD263304351C875C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1702242314767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17338495539278442448F2F14D3EB0D13A51565E2DA182D0ADB3620B52A831E56FAD263304351C875C7