Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 06:30:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204
Participant Details

Original Note:

He actually wouldn't block her ever, cause these replies are undisclosed paid promotion to attract people to her adult content page. This fake hostility is this user's common tactic to reply to her, giving ger visibility while sticking to the account's gimmick. Example given: https://twitter.com/insultsrare/status/1732990227021459614?t=UGTP3XQzv5jvdeMDjwYvXw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733727451941859612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204
  • createdAtMillis - 1702189828132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733727451941859612D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204