Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 10:31:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6FD84ACB69654EBC2419347F08F1D64BAD6C8984A8FE6C28848C6A0A502E091F
Participant Details

Original Note:

He actually wouldn't block her ever, cause these replies are undisclosed paid promotion to attract people to her adult content page. This fake hostility is this user's common tactic to reply to her, giving ger visibility while sticking to the account's gimmick. Example given: https://twitter.com/insultsrare/status/1732990227021459614?t=UGTP3XQzv5jvdeMDjwYvXw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733727451941859612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6FD84ACB69654EBC2419347F08F1D64BAD6C8984A8FE6C28848C6A0A502E091F
  • createdAtMillis - 1702204294710
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17337274519418596126FD84ACB69654EBC2419347F08F1D64BAD6C8984A8FE6C28848C6A0A502E091F