Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 10:01:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F6FA8ECE8DC0479D7A99E22D48D00A4A5C762C35524B9F963D456490A3B3BBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

He actually wouldn't block her ever, cause these replies are undisclosed paid promotion to attract people to her adult content page. This fake hostility is this user's common tactic to reply to her, giving ger visibility while sticking to the account's gimmick. Example given: https://twitter.com/insultsrare/status/1732990227021459614?t=UGTP3XQzv5jvdeMDjwYvXw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733727451941859612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F6FA8ECE8DC0479D7A99E22D48D00A4A5C762C35524B9F963D456490A3B3BBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1702202466854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17337274519418596120F6FA8ECE8DC0479D7A99E22D48D00A4A5C762C35524B9F963D456490A3B3BBA