Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 03:39:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C
Participant Details

Original Note:

日本も欧米も毒性試験結果等の科学的根拠に基づいてADI(許容一日摂取量)やARfD(急性参照用量)を決定し、それぞれ超えないように基準値を決めるルールは同じです。 各国毎に個々の食品の消費量を考慮して、国民一人当たりの摂取量がADIおよびARfDの80%以内に留まるように、個々の食品毎の基準値を定めています。 日本も欧米も基本的な制度は同じです。 https://www.fsc.go.jp/emerg/adi.pdf https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/shokuhin/zanryu/faq.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-11130500-Shokuhinanzenbu/0000059523.pdf https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/consumer_safety/food_safety/risk_commu_2019_003/pdf/consumer_safety_cms203_20200327_01.pdf https://agrifact.jp/pesticide-residue-limits-have-not-been-loosened-what-truth-about-glyphosate7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733689718049784294
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C
  • createdAtMillis - 1702179544544
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733689718049784294B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C