Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 16:09:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4D8BFEC0CF97F6BAACFD4CEC46368173040E636F5A65C1EF09D9BE0249D7D3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note members: If you cite @thedailybeast as a source reference, your note will automatically be labeled as “Not Helpful” due to “Source Unreliable.” It’s 2023 and none of their Russia Collusion stories have been retracted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733683095407046724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4D8BFEC0CF97F6BAACFD4CEC46368173040E636F5A65C1EF09D9BE0249D7D3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702224595219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733683095407046724C4D8BFEC0CF97F6BAACFD4CEC46368173040E636F5A65C1EF09D9BE0249D7D3D