Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 08:11:56 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 927E0348CF1C500BB9E22CB3C77AB9005DCB30101B8D4CEB9E54FBC2AEB863CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note members: If you cite @thedailybeast as a source reference, your note will automatically be labeled as “Not Helpful” due to “Source Unreliable.” It’s 2023 and none of their Russia Collusion stories have been retracted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733683095407046724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 927E0348CF1C500BB9E22CB3C77AB9005DCB30101B8D4CEB9E54FBC2AEB863CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1702195916161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733683095407046724927E0348CF1C500BB9E22CB3C77AB9005DCB30101B8D4CEB9E54FBC2AEB863CC