Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 08:08:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note members: If you cite @thedailybeast as a source reference, your note will automatically be labeled as “Not Helpful” due to “Source Unreliable.” It’s 2023 and none of their Russia Collusion stories have been retracted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733683095407046724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
  • createdAtMillis - 1702195727886
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17336830954070467240B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935