Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 22:40:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7ACEFAB8673F186563A1FEF1DCF92C207543F78A237875EF6094A668FD9BC3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence of Photoshop use (the font and anti-aliasing is consistent). This is a plausible response that is in line with Grok's other responses that have been posted online. Burden of proof is on the note writer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733612259820122330
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7ACEFAB8673F186563A1FEF1DCF92C207543F78A237875EF6094A668FD9BC3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1702161652780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733612259820122330F7ACEFAB8673F186563A1FEF1DCF92C207543F78A237875EF6094A668FD9BC3C