Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 18:22:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CAB325B82E84586FEF6EA08E2F4A1F5AC430902970FBC4365FED1BD6938B5D81
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence of Photoshop use (the font and anti-aliasing is consistent). This is a plausible response that is in line with Grok's other responses that have been posted online. Burden of proof is on the note writer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733612259820122330
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CAB325B82E84586FEF6EA08E2F4A1F5AC430902970FBC4365FED1BD6938B5D81
  • createdAtMillis - 1702232521689
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733612259820122330CAB325B82E84586FEF6EA08E2F4A1F5AC430902970FBC4365FED1BD6938B5D81