Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 13:04:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 488F9863C84B36AAFDDDF57ACE6ACC65074F6A6A6983A043C9480315CF993DF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence of Photoshop use (the font and anti-aliasing is consistent). This is a plausible response that is in line with Grok's other responses that have been posted online. Burden of proof is on the note writer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733612259820122330
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 488F9863C84B36AAFDDDF57ACE6ACC65074F6A6A6983A043C9480315CF993DF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1702213473619
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733612259820122330488F9863C84B36AAFDDDF57ACE6ACC65074F6A6A6983A043C9480315CF993DF3