Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 17:07:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8360D247FFBF26BDA4F5E883CEEFF6C73B7E3E5DA51B823C7CE7A0C8458B43D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Further, notes used Ad-Hominem sources that violate journalistic ethics by not allowing a subject of the article the opportunity to provide comment. Given the nature of claims made, such sources should be disregarded as unreliable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733559991112548367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8360D247FFBF26BDA4F5E883CEEFF6C73B7E3E5DA51B823C7CE7A0C8458B43D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702228029194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733559991112548367F8360D247FFBF26BDA4F5E883CEEFF6C73B7E3E5DA51B823C7CE7A0C8458B43D