Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 02:24:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3E79FEE1012CBA583164DD397A5FD8322D8B82042F8E000B31A4FE0A912CCFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Further, notes used Ad-Hominem sources that violate journalistic ethics by not allowing a subject of the article the opportunity to provide comment. Given the nature of claims made, such sources should be disregarded as unreliable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733559991112548367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3E79FEE1012CBA583164DD397A5FD8322D8B82042F8E000B31A4FE0A912CCFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1702175075050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733559991112548367B3E79FEE1012CBA583164DD397A5FD8322D8B82042F8E000B31A4FE0A912CCFA