Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 17:41:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post does not need a community notes, esspecially ones that justify chinese agression, against other countries while violating international law. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/SOUTHCHINASEA-RULING/010020QR1SG/index.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733534519452430722
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204
createdAtMillis - 1702143679787
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1733534519452430722D391D4116A9FEA0D883A04CB6B300413CF26850EE689A5EB5E145B255C2A8204