Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 21:54:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Arguments about the study's methodologies should be made in the comments, not Community Notes. The tweet correctly summarized the published study's conclusions. https://t.co/ThfhI0r0jx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733505479832158609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1702158840954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17335054798321586095211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4