Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 21:39:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30FBA185CC2B1F70B89CAB54614FFCA0E91CE3D19F809BD43D0E2C7C772FE9FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

A credibilidade da informação mencionada é questionável, tendo em vista que a fonte referida possui um histórico significativo de imprecisões e uma tendência de inclinações políticas em suas pesquisas. https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/matheus-leitao/a-desculpa-inacreditavel-do-datafolha-para-os-erros-das-pesquisas https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/resultados-das-urnas-divergem-de-pesquisas-eleitorais/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733483396746101024
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 30FBA185CC2B1F70B89CAB54614FFCA0E91CE3D19F809BD43D0E2C7C772FE9FA
createdAtMillis - 1702244378275
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 173348339674610102430FBA185CC2B1F70B89CAB54614FFCA0E91CE3D19F809BD43D0E2C7C772FE9FA