Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 12:35:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5885CB9F86533820A2EC695C5603BE28B6FF92C8BC6655ED0487C85D28CE00F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

CSIS never called Pierre a Chinese asset. The author may be confused with current allegations against the liberal government. https://www.google.com/search?q=chinese+asset+csis+pierre+poilievre The allegation that Pierre hates LGBTQ+ is unfounded, reinforced by the untrue premise that Pierre hates his own father. They have a good relationship

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733469589692961020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5885CB9F86533820A2EC695C5603BE28B6FF92C8BC6655ED0487C85D28CE00F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1711370155682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17334695896929610205885CB9F86533820A2EC695C5603BE28B6FF92C8BC6655ED0487C85D28CE00F1