Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 11:30:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E55D0AE02E3A3456EB65F45BCC159ECDCA334D14D1B05F8AABD5B68FBADE8B2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

O DataFolha tem um histórico recente de diversos erros em pesquisas. Tal resultado pode não ser confiável. https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/matheus-leitao/a-desculpa-inacreditavel-do-datafolha-para-os-erros-das-pesquisas/mobile

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733428886656974961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E55D0AE02E3A3456EB65F45BCC159ECDCA334D14D1B05F8AABD5B68FBADE8B2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702121412421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733428886656974961E55D0AE02E3A3456EB65F45BCC159ECDCA334D14D1B05F8AABD5B68FBADE8B2D