Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 15:10:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63E40A07E1CB6B30BB72730684C9BF7F382A892888B35A585868569F2EE0C8E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Refaat responded within hours of the claim, before any alleged 'debunking' and it is this point to which the tweet refers. At the time, the claim was neither verified nor unverified and Refaat was one of many who mocked the story immediately.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733306244939817293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63E40A07E1CB6B30BB72730684C9BF7F382A892888B35A585868569F2EE0C8E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1712416207260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173330624493981729363E40A07E1CB6B30BB72730684C9BF7F382A892888B35A585868569F2EE0C8E8