Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 03:23:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 551C61F5C669CCB7D2DFC11E83C271029550514C8CD5C240A4C9E2B6809469FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Refaat responded within hours of the claim, before any alleged 'debunking' and it is this point to which the tweet refers. At the time, the claim was neither verified nor unverified and Refaat was one of many who mocked the story immediately.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733306244939817293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 551C61F5C669CCB7D2DFC11E83C271029550514C8CD5C240A4C9E2B6809469FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1702697030531
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733306244939817293551C61F5C669CCB7D2DFC11E83C271029550514C8CD5C240A4C9E2B6809469FD