Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 03:39:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25942A052AF806986E563732E81BB440002BE7C0CB69C7302DEBC11CD07DD21C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Refaat responded within hours of the claim, before any alleged 'debunking' and it is this point to which the tweet refers. At the time, the claim was neither verified nor unverified and Refaat was one of many who mocked the story immediately.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733306244939817293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25942A052AF806986E563732E81BB440002BE7C0CB69C7302DEBC11CD07DD21C
  • createdAtMillis - 1702093144372
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173330624493981729325942A052AF806986E563732E81BB440002BE7C0CB69C7302DEBC11CD07DD21C