Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 09:04:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is an issue still under debate, and the proposed note links to old articles from 2020. For example, a more recent article suggesting otherwise: https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a CNs should correct information that has been proven to be incorrect, not answer speculation with more speculation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733138659472261135
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1702112672336
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733138659472261135851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2