Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-08 19:20:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 519C922D1A39C76AF8DF1E061AE28AF1139F2B688A99AD500501697056BEAF38
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事からは弁護側が「ガス室か電気椅子での処刑」を求めたとは読み取れません。 ガスや薬物注射という手法に対し、「現行の絞首刑が憲法が禁じる『残虐な刑罰』に当たる」という「絞首刑の違憲性」を主張し、そのため「死刑を選択するべきではないと極刑回避を求めた」とあります。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20231207-EP4AP2QKRVKGPBUWYRFVZYIA7Y/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733126327015022667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 519C922D1A39C76AF8DF1E061AE28AF1139F2B688A99AD500501697056BEAF38
  • createdAtMillis - 1702063207306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733126327015022667519C922D1A39C76AF8DF1E061AE28AF1139F2B688A99AD500501697056BEAF38