Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 19:40:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette décision ne lui revient pas, les vitraux faisant partie d'un tout historique protégé par l'UNESCO au titre du patrimoine mondial de l'humanité, et ne pouvant être modifié par le seul fait du prince. https://whc.unesco.org/fr/list/600 https://whc.unesco.org/fr/actualites/2102 https://www.lexpress.fr/societe/restaurer-notre-dame-a-l-identique-comment-les-puristes-veillent-au-grain_2158383.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733090755877425295
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 88D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A
createdAtMillis - 1702150812681
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 173309075587742529588D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A