Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 02:24:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 888FEBFE680607E1149A2BC786E311E60294BCB27D12C9122C6A60B9BB7A25C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Holly Lawford-Smith, a respected scholar from @UniMelb, has not endorsed the views attributed to her in the tweet. The interdisciplinary peer-reviewed 'Journal of Controversial Ideas' encourages debate under pseudonyms to protect authors, not to promote any particular ideas. https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/797909-holly-lawford-smith

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733087092199354674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 888FEBFE680607E1149A2BC786E311E60294BCB27D12C9122C6A60B9BB7A25C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1702175082325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733087092199354674888FEBFE680607E1149A2BC786E311E60294BCB27D12C9122C6A60B9BB7A25C5