Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-08 16:49:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8E2403E3F6176C68DCBD2E660507A7ECCD915D612B3F5D9EF38B52AD51B14FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misleading. Meta responded to these claims admitting that due to the volume of posts, some may be shadowbanned in error on ALL sides, but NO EVIDENCE for shadowbans specifically to Palestinian posts. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/18/instagram-palestine-posts-censorship-accusations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733022341687353402
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C8E2403E3F6176C68DCBD2E660507A7ECCD915D612B3F5D9EF38B52AD51B14FC
createdAtMillis - 1702054142920
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1733022341687353402C8E2403E3F6176C68DCBD2E660507A7ECCD915D612B3F5D9EF38B52AD51B14FC