Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-09 05:57:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note #2 in the NNN section provides sources which contradicts their own note. For example- Haaretz credibility is listed as high and his left bias only undermines the note's point. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/haaretz/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732905539468718351
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD
  • createdAtMillis - 1702101427391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732905539468718351C3DF2D006E32851438B469A035D02519C3F300CE8F35DF8CD3209A0AD7D78ACD