Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 00:26:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note #2 in the NNN section provides sources which contradicts their own note. For example- Haaretz credibility is listed as high and his left bias only undermines the note's point. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/haaretz/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732905539468718351
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868
  • createdAtMillis - 1702167972802
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17329055394687183515B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868