Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 16:49:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 206152B08F2B7E6241114D6560208A28C3E1932BC12D3592267E59E449C613CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The selected excerpt from Matthew Martin's court proceeding is out of context. He was acquitted because the judge believed only that Martin *thought* he was being allowed in by police, not that he was actually being allowed in. Transcript from 4/6/22 bench trial: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.232204/gov.uscourts.dcd.232204.43.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732793036428488861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 206152B08F2B7E6241114D6560208A28C3E1932BC12D3592267E59E449C613CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1701967787292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1732793036428488861206152B08F2B7E6241114D6560208A28C3E1932BC12D3592267E59E449C613CA