Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 14:26:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 896D3E7703B94E67E2840856B5DAED01C3D80C6028B77024BEC48089034F9139
Participant Details

Original Note:

デマです、胸部レントゲン一回の被ばく量が0.1mSvなのに対しマンモグラフィはその半分程度です。 骨がなく厚みも薄い部分なので強い放射線を当てる必要がありません。 https://www.lab.toho-u.ac.jp/med/ohashi/radio_section/inspection/general_photography/mammography_question.html#:~:text=%E5%88%86%E7%A8%8B%E5%BA%A6%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82-,%E8%A2%AB%E3%81%B0%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AB%E3%82%88%E3%82%8B%E5%8D%B1%E9%99%BA%E3%81%AF%EF%BC%9F,%E9%87%8F%E3%81%AF2.4mSv%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732763371622072461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 896D3E7703B94E67E2840856B5DAED01C3D80C6028B77024BEC48089034F9139
  • createdAtMillis - 1701959188890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732763371622072461896D3E7703B94E67E2840856B5DAED01C3D80C6028B77024BEC48089034F9139