Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 23:25:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05E495543D27B7F3A104C7E177DD60FFD0927422543A24D37D3813D16C656FE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

デマです、胸部レントゲン一回の被ばく量が0.1mSvなのに対しマンモグラフィはその半分程度です。 骨がなく厚みも薄い部分なので強い放射線を当てる必要がありません。 https://www.lab.toho-u.ac.jp/med/ohashi/radio_section/inspection/general_photography/mammography_question.html#:~:text=%E5%88%86%E7%A8%8B%E5%BA%A6%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82-,%E8%A2%AB%E3%81%B0%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AB%E3%82%88%E3%82%8B%E5%8D%B1%E9%99%BA%E3%81%AF%EF%BC%9F,%E9%87%8F%E3%81%AF2.4mSv%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732763371622072461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05E495543D27B7F3A104C7E177DD60FFD0927422543A24D37D3813D16C656FE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1701991537370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173276337162207246105E495543D27B7F3A104C7E177DD60FFD0927422543A24D37D3813D16C656FE0