Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 12:23:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 949FA3E96C7008DCC8B0E07DBD01DE73D86152ACFC4F220B704FB08A91868089
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study is a preprint and hasn't undergone peer review. While not implying inaccuracies, it hasn't been assessed by peers, including validation of methodology or potential misinterpretations. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298565v1#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20mRNA%20vaccine%20was,%2D2.589%5D%2C%20P%3C.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732712949708472430
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 949FA3E96C7008DCC8B0E07DBD01DE73D86152ACFC4F220B704FB08A91868089
  • createdAtMillis - 1701951790988
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1732712949708472430949FA3E96C7008DCC8B0E07DBD01DE73D86152ACFC4F220B704FB08A91868089