Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 10:35:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The linked preprint is a direct comment on the linked Nature study; it is *building* on that. This is how science works. The original authors don’t have exclusive right to draw conclusions from their observations. Additionally, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732701304055566665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259
  • createdAtMillis - 1701945313899
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732701304055566665C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259