Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 13:13:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36908D8FFBBFA9550D6E19EC85EEE70002F5C65AC2DC9A1415F58C11346438DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The linked preprint is a direct comment on the linked Nature study; it is *building* on that. This is how science works. The original authors don’t have exclusive right to draw conclusions from their observations. Additionally, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732701304055566665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36908D8FFBBFA9550D6E19EC85EEE70002F5C65AC2DC9A1415F58C11346438DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1701954821976
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173270130405556666536908D8FFBBFA9550D6E19EC85EEE70002F5C65AC2DC9A1415F58C11346438DC