Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 12:51:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06F324C0F4DA0484385538FEA3690E632CB2F42D49DB89ED75824C99FDED53A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The linked preprint is a direct comment on the linked Nature study; it is *building* on that. This is how science works. The original authors don’t have exclusive right to draw conclusions from their observations. Additionally, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732701304055566665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06F324C0F4DA0484385538FEA3690E632CB2F42D49DB89ED75824C99FDED53A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1701953502077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173270130405556666506F324C0F4DA0484385538FEA3690E632CB2F42D49DB89ED75824C99FDED53A6