Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 10:22:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1A4810D40876543E59403186146BA1A187A1147424F0EBADA9A366AA95AB63C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The linked preprint is a direct comment on the linked Nature study; it is *building* on that. This is how science works. The original authors don’t have exclusive right to draw conclusions from their observations. Additionally, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732700851242762395
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1A4810D40876543E59403186146BA1A187A1147424F0EBADA9A366AA95AB63C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701944566028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732700851242762395C1A4810D40876543E59403186146BA1A187A1147424F0EBADA9A366AA95AB63C