Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 06:01:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1F1E3B2CB7E3B5A2B0558C4332571F15BAA53BF7CDCC2DAEF4152918B01AD45
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a statement of personal opinion. Additionally, characterizations of a “refusal to answer” are argumentative and biased. Gay provided answers to the congressional committee as to when and why calls for genocide might violate Harvards rules.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732569046317408496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1F1E3B2CB7E3B5A2B0558C4332571F15BAA53BF7CDCC2DAEF4152918B01AD45
  • createdAtMillis - 1701928886432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732569046317408496B1F1E3B2CB7E3B5A2B0558C4332571F15BAA53BF7CDCC2DAEF4152918B01AD45