Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 19:42:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CD08FF7791CC592BD4EDB44C92D92B2C9A82B43E7FBA33602D50C8A7DF5F9AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a statement of personal opinion. Additionally, characterizations of a “refusal to answer” are argumentative and biased. Gay provided answers to the congressional committee as to when and why calls for genocide might violate Harvards rules.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732569046317408496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CD08FF7791CC592BD4EDB44C92D92B2C9A82B43E7FBA33602D50C8A7DF5F9AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1701978121975
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17325690463174084968CD08FF7791CC592BD4EDB44C92D92B2C9A82B43E7FBA33602D50C8A7DF5F9AE