Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 05:48:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86E6F68378171CC6F5DCEC3341D5C0A8861ED81F63D7726B8A2B809CDAD478F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a statement of personal opinion. Additionally, characterizations of a “refusal to answer” are argumentative and biased. Gay provided answers to the congressional committee as to when and why calls for genocide might violate Harvards rules.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732569046317408496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86E6F68378171CC6F5DCEC3341D5C0A8861ED81F63D7726B8A2B809CDAD478F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1701928081864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173256904631740849686E6F68378171CC6F5DCEC3341D5C0A8861ED81F63D7726B8A2B809CDAD478F1