Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 17:28:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69A25719A08D1FE9333D3B97361590B1F5C4888EB8CF94CA75D7D6FEB5170AD0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a statement of personal opinion. Additionally, characterizations of a “refusal to answer” are argumentative and biased. Gay provided answers to the congressional committee as to when and why calls for genocide might violate Harvards rules.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732569046317408496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69A25719A08D1FE9333D3B97361590B1F5C4888EB8CF94CA75D7D6FEB5170AD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1706635687795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173256904631740849669A25719A08D1FE9333D3B97361590B1F5C4888EB8CF94CA75D7D6FEB5170AD0