Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 04:42:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 055BCAF64D150E298B1D41E777F9CFEC1E0FF2B347AF2A401ED42C3ADEC70F39
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a statement of personal opinion. Additionally, characterizations of a “refusal to answer” are argumentative and biased. Gay provided answers to the congressional committee as to when and why calls for genocide might violate Harvards rules.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732569046317408496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 055BCAF64D150E298B1D41E777F9CFEC1E0FF2B347AF2A401ED42C3ADEC70F39
  • createdAtMillis - 1701924135928
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732569046317408496055BCAF64D150E298B1D41E777F9CFEC1E0FF2B347AF2A401ED42C3ADEC70F39