Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-06 11:31:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62FF211A716186515084000043A7943E153F87E83E547A29D89A3B40D24303BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

公開討論はすべきでない理由は以下の通り。 発言の一つ一つが根拠に基づいているかの評価をリアルタイムに行う事はほぼ不可能で、科学的な正しさより弁が立つ者に有利。 「ニセ科学は公開討論を要求しがち」な理由はこれ?→納得の声多数「公開討論で得をするのはニセ科学側」 https://togetter.com/li/2004577 #Togetter @togetter_jpから

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732334254754005139
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62FF211A716186515084000043A7943E153F87E83E547A29D89A3B40D24303BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1701862272747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173233425475400513962FF211A716186515084000043A7943E153F87E83E547A29D89A3B40D24303BB