Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-06 15:01:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0657047C0859A3FC63A8698B293F93F6E7E15625480AC06897AE09986D3DB8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

"No evidence" is not a refutation. The claim made is inconclusive, not disproven. I also remind certain prolific community notes contributors that the requirement to "act in good faith" includes not posting hundreds or thousands of notes all defending Government c19 narratives.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732220152219849192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0657047C0859A3FC63A8698B293F93F6E7E15625480AC06897AE09986D3DB8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701874891265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732220152219849192E0657047C0859A3FC63A8698B293F93F6E7E15625480AC06897AE09986D3DB8F