Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 00:05:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9858DC41FBBC442DCD8909F91D3DB64F36EA1F5D9C880FC16C3BFB04802E0D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

"No evidence" is not a refutation. The claim made is inconclusive, not disproven. I also remind certain prolific community notes contributors that the requirement to "act in good faith" includes not posting hundreds or thousands of notes all defending Government c19 narratives.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732220152219849192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9858DC41FBBC442DCD8909F91D3DB64F36EA1F5D9C880FC16C3BFB04802E0D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1701907506598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732220152219849192B9858DC41FBBC442DCD8909F91D3DB64F36EA1F5D9C880FC16C3BFB04802E0D6