Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-06 03:53:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45ECFE53F0D2D13A1DBF82D01ED5D3DE1F0155BA9CE4BF4DE71355547E298E2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

"No evidence" is not a refutation. The claim made is inconclusive, not disproven. I also remind certain prolific community notes contributors that the requirement to "act in good faith" includes not posting hundreds or thousands of notes all defending Government c19 narratives.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732220152219849192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45ECFE53F0D2D13A1DBF82D01ED5D3DE1F0155BA9CE4BF4DE71355547E298E2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1701834807645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173222015221984919245ECFE53F0D2D13A1DBF82D01ED5D3DE1F0155BA9CE4BF4DE71355547E298E2A