Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-06 02:49:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
Participant Details

Original Note:

"No evidence" is not a refutation. The claim made is inconclusive, not disproven. I also remind certain prolific community notes contributors that the requirement to "act in good faith" includes not posting hundreds or thousands of notes all defending Government c19 narratives.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732220152219849192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
  • createdAtMillis - 1701830999392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17322201522198491921F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79