Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 20:06:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E00BA33529FBA5C62EC602EE8422B67EF9AEC963B1C6E8F70ED5FBC485CFC7EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Previous Note links to partisan article rather than the source: the original PBO published work was only examining carbon fuel tax yet still also found “majority of households see a net gain” https://distribution-a617274656661637473.pbo-dpb.ca/7590f619bb5d3b769ce09bdbc7c1ccce75ccd8b1bcfb506fc601a2409640bfdd#page3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732120734577852925
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E00BA33529FBA5C62EC602EE8422B67EF9AEC963B1C6E8F70ED5FBC485CFC7EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1701806771840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732120734577852925E00BA33529FBA5C62EC602EE8422B67EF9AEC963B1C6E8F70ED5FBC485CFC7EE