Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 20:31:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 276EF71E2BC62956016981D257351D22AD4D46DB140A9171CDCEAEEC45AC120C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writer is expressing an opinion as fact without providing proof of the claim, and likely for a biased political purpose. https://cpcassets.conservative.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/15090948/9f7f204744e7480.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732069548361449977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 276EF71E2BC62956016981D257351D22AD4D46DB140A9171CDCEAEEC45AC120C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701808280679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1732069548361449977276EF71E2BC62956016981D257351D22AD4D46DB140A9171CDCEAEEC45AC120C