Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 12:23:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68731FF46E30F5C585114B586D6CAC37803531EA4641497F1E219AEA5C7D5E81
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP's opinion Haaretz is a high quality newspaper is in line with "Media Bias/Fact Check" site as a credible. The CN is arguing with OP with their opinion Haaretz being biased as it's not publishing a specific news. Out of context CN, belongs to the comments section. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/haaretz/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732003551868592195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68731FF46E30F5C585114B586D6CAC37803531EA4641497F1E219AEA5C7D5E81
  • createdAtMillis - 1701778991076
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173200355186859219568731FF46E30F5C585114B586D6CAC37803531EA4641497F1E219AEA5C7D5E81